Reaktion #1806703

ord-84aef82641224df7916bb723f22bff25

Reaktionsbedingungen

Detaillierte Bedingungen
See reaction.notes.procedure_details.

Aufarbeitung

  1. 1
    Temperaturheated on a steam bath for 3.5 hr
  2. 2
    TemperaturThe resulting solution was cooled
  3. 3
    Extraktionextracted with chloroform
  4. 4
    ExtraktionThe chloroform extract
  5. 5
    Waschenwas washed with water, and saturated sodium chloride solution
  6. 6
    Trocknendried over magnesium sulfate
  7. 7
    Sonstigeevaporated
  8. 8
    SonstigeThe residue, 2 g, was chromatographed by high pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) procedures
  9. 9
    Waschenas eluting liquid
  10. 10
    Sonstigecollecting 20 ml fractions
  11. 11
    SonstigeFractions 1 to 14 gave no product material

Vorschrift

A mixture of 2.5 g (9.5 mmoles) of cis-N-(3-hydroxypropyl)-N-[2-[hydroxy(phenyl)methyl][cyclohexyl]amine, 10 ml of toluene and 6.45 g of 48% v/v aqueous hydrogen bromide solution was stirred and heated on a steam bath for 3.5 hr. The resulting solution was cooled, basified with 20% sodium hydroxide solution and extracted with chloroform. The chloroform extract was washed with water, and saturated sodium chloride solution and then dried over magnesium sulfate and evaporated. The residue, 2 g, was chromatographed by high pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) procedures using a Merck silica gel, size C column and 10% v/v methanol/in chloroform/1% v/v ammonium hydroxide mixture as eluting liquid, collecting 20 ml fractions. Fractions 1 to 14 gave no product material. Fractions 15 to 25 gave 0.686 g (30% yield) of (±)-(E)-1-[2-(phenylmethylene)cyclohexyl]azetidine, which was identified by NMR analysis comparison with the NMR of standard, authentic compound. Fractions 26 to 31 gave 0.25 g of a mixture, and fractions 32 to 50 gave 0.286 g of N-(3-hydroxypropyl)-N-[2-(phenylmethylene)cyclohexyl]amine which was identified by NMR comparison with a known standard sample, and also by conversion to its hydrochloride salt which was identical to a standard sample by NMR, UV and IR spectral analysis comparisons.

Quelle

DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.5104873.v1Patent: US04540690uspto-grants-1985_09